In a competitive market, we modeled firms as “price-takers” since there were so many of them selling identical products
Marginal cost pricing, which is allocatively efficient for society
In the long-run, free entry and exit caused prices to equal (average & marginal) costs and pushed economic profits to zero
Adam Smith
1723-1790
“People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices,” (Book I, Chapter 2.2).
Smith, Adam, 1776, An Enquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations
All sellers would like to raise prices and extract more revenue from consumers
Competition from other sellers (and potential entrants) drives prices to equal costs & economic profits to zero
If a firm in a competitive market raised p>MC(q), would lose all of its customers!
Market power: ability to raise p>MC(q) (and not lose all customers)
Firms that have market power behave differently than firms in a competitive market
Start with simple assumption of a single seller: monopoly
Next class:
A firm with market power is a “price-maker”
We can also call it a “price-searcher”
With a monopoly, we can safely ignore the effects that other firms have on the firm’s behavior (because there are none!)
Choose: < output and price: (q⋆,p⋆) >
In order to maximize: < profits: π >
Firms are constrained by relationship between quantity and price that consumers are willing to pay
Market (inverse) demand describes maximum price consumers are willing to pay for a given quantity
Implications:
As firm chooses to produce more q, must lower the price on all units to sell them
Price effect: lost revenue from lowering price on all sales
As firm chooses to produce more q, must lower the price on all units to sell them
Price effect: lost revenue from lowering price on all sales
Output effect: gained revenue from increase in sales
ΔR(q)=pΔq + qΔp
ΔR(q)=pΔq + qΔp
ΔR(q)=pΔq + qΔp
Output effect: increases number of units sold (Δq) times price p per unit
Price effect: lowers price per unit (Δp) on all units sold (q)
ΔR(q)=pΔq + qΔp
Output effect: increases number of units sold (Δq) times price p per unit
Price effect: lowers price per unit (Δp) on all units sold (q)
Divide both sides by Δq to get Marginal Revenue, MR(q):
ΔR(q)Δq=MR(q)=p+ΔpΔqq
ΔR(q)=pΔq + qΔp
Output effect: increases number of units sold (Δq) times price p per unit
Price effect: lowers price per unit (Δp) on all units sold (q)
Divide both sides by Δq to get Marginal Revenue, MR(q):
ΔR(q)Δq=MR(q)=p+ΔpΔqq
MR(q)=p+(b)qMR(q)=(a+bq)+bqMR(q)=a+2bq
p(q)=a+bqMR(q)=a+2bq
Marginal revenue starts at same intercept as Demand (a) with twice the slope (2b)
Don’t forget the slopes (b) are always negative!
Example: Suppose the market demand is given by:
q=12.5−0.25p
Find the function for a monopolist’s marginal revenue curve.
Calculate the monopolist’s marginal revenue if the firm produces 6 units, and 7 units.
Demand Price Elasticity | MR(q) | R(q) |
---|---|---|
|ϵ|>1 Elastic | Positive | Increasing |
|ϵ|=1 Unit | 0 | Maximized |
|ϵ|<1 Inelastic | Negative | Decreasing |
Strong relationship between price elasticity of demand and revenues
Monopolists only produce where demand is elastic, with positive MR(q)!
Perfect competition: p=MC(q) (allocatively efficient)
Market power defined as firm(s)’ ability to raise mark up p>MC(q)
Size of markup depends on price elasticity of demand
i.e. the less responsive to prices consumers are, the higher the price the firm can charge
L=p−MC(q)p=−1ϵ
See today's class notes for the derivation.
The more (less) elastic a good, the less (more) the optimal markup: L=p−MC(q)p=−1ϵ
Demand Less Elastic at p∗
Demand More Elastic at p∗
π(q)=R(q)−C(q)
Graph: find q∗ to max π⟹q∗ where max distance between R(q) and C(q)
π(q)=R(q)−C(q)
Graph: find q∗ to max π⟹q∗ where max distance between R(q) and C(q)
Slopes must be equal: MR(q)=MC(q)
π(q)=R(q)−C(q)
Graph: find q∗ to max π⟹q∗ where max distance between R(q) and C(q)
Slopes must be equal: MR(q)=MC(q)
At low output q<q∗, can increase π by producing more
MR(q)>MC(q)
At high output q>q∗, can increase π by producing less
MR(q)<MC(q)
Profit-maximizing quantity is always q∗ where MR(q) = MC(q)
But monopolist faces entire market demand
Profit-maximizing quantity is always q∗ where MR(q) = MC(q)
But monopolist faces entire market demand
Break even price p=AC(q)min
Profit-maximizing quantity is always q∗ where MR(q) = MC(q)
But monopolist faces entire market demand
Break even price p=AC(q)min
Shut-down price p=AVC(q)min
Produce the optimal amount of output q∗ where MR(q)=MC(q)
Raise price to maximum consumers are WTP: p∗=Demand(q∗)
Produce the optimal amount of output q∗ where MR(q)=MC(q)
Raise price to maximum consumers are WTP: p∗=Demand(q∗)
Calculate profit with average cost: π=[p−AC(q)]q
Produce the optimal amount of output q∗ where MR(q)=MC(q)
Raise price to maximum consumers are WTP: p∗=Demand(q∗)
Calculate profit with average cost: π=[p−AC(q)]q
Shut down in the short run if p<AVC(q)
Produce the optimal amount of output q∗ where MR(q)=MC(q)
Raise price to maximum consumers are WTP: p∗=Demand(q∗)
Calculate profit with average cost: π=[p−AC(q)]q
Shut down in the short run if p<AVC(q)
Exit in the long run if p<AC(q)
Example: Consider the market for iPhones. Suppose Apple's costs are:
C(q)=2.5q2+25,000MC(q)=5q
The demand for iPhones is given by (quantity is in millions of iPhones):
q=300−0.2p
Keyboard shortcuts
↑, ←, Pg Up, k | Go to previous slide |
↓, →, Pg Dn, Space, j | Go to next slide |
Home | Go to first slide |
End | Go to last slide |
Number + Return | Go to specific slide |
b / m / f | Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode |
c | Clone slideshow |
p | Toggle presenter mode |
t | Restart the presentation timer |
?, h | Toggle this help |
Esc | Back to slideshow |